Re: Prolonged Breastfeeding May Protect Against Childhood Leukemia
Back when I was a college student I took a European womens history class and we were studing child care in England in the 19th and 20th centuries. Before this time period pediatrics never really existed. They had midwives to help with child birth, which they still continued for quite some time. Then when the wives would do their daily chores they would hang their babies on hooks.
During the 19th and 20th centuries they had leagues of lady nurses since women couldn't be doctors. The huge controversy during this time was whether or not breastfeeding was beneficial to the baby. The wealthy elite preferred to bottle feed because they could afford the bottles and the nipples and they liked how much easier it was. The poor still continued to breastfeed because they couldn't afford the extra expense of these supplies. There were leagues of ladies that would go into the poor areas and try to tell the mothers the ease of bottle feeding and how it was more sanitary. But the truth of the matter was that it was not sanitary and the poor refused not only because of the extra expense of the supplies, but they did not want to go along with the ways of the wealthy elite. In comparing breastfeeding and bottle feeding during this time period they found that breastfeeding was the healthiest and most beneficial to the baby.
I think nowadays women are so busy that it is easier to pump and can be less awkward if you're in a public place. In my opinion I think that breastfeeding is healthier and it just seems more like a natural motherly thing to do.
__________________
Tai
Maternity.com Forum Director
|